I read your stuff. It looks to me that you're basing your beliefs on discredited hypothesis of James Mellart and infamous Kurgan "hypothesis" of Marija Gimbutas. No respectable anthropologists or archaeologists today buy their romanticist garbage. There is no "traditionalist" feminism. All evidences point to a history of men dominating and oppressing wimmin first with their primitive worship, then with more "civilized" religions of Ahura Mazda, Yahweh, Jesus and Allah. So it is in my opinion more honest to tell wimmin that you are here to deconstruct patriarchal religions, instead of disguising all this with trappings of old worn-out Christianity and Hinduism. The notion that the vast evidence for the original feminine orientation of all civilization across the globe has somehow been "discredited" is thoroughly dealt with in The Myth of the Myth of Matriarchy. We suggest you read it. We are unsure why someone who dismisses the whole of patriarchal civilization as a tale of oppression should suddenly have such daddy-complex awe for "respectable" archeologists and anthropologists who are very decidedly a part of the patriarchal hierarchy and perform outlandish contortions in order to deny the evidence and perpetuate the myth of the inevitability of patriarchy. On the other hand, we do not support the Kurgan hypothesis (that patriarchy was brought about by a race of Indo-European barbarians). As The Feminine Universe makes clear, feminine civilization was displaced by patriarchy all over the world. It is not an historical accident caused by one particular tribe but appears to be a part of the inevitable decline of the Kali Yuga. To that extent patriarchy does have a certain inevitability. But it is very clear that it has not always existed. Quite why you suppose the religions of Christianity and Hinduism to be "worn out", we have no idea. We do not ourselves espouse them but they are traditions that have brought salvation to countless thousands during the patriarchal era, and have even provided ways for Our Mother God to be worshiped in Her true Form. They certainly cannot be dismissed with a supercilious malediction. We have no interest in feminism, traditionalist or otherwise. But we do certainly uphold the feminine tradition in faith. You seem anxious to prove, along with daddy patriarch, that the feminine tradition does not exist. And that history has been nothing but a dreary tale of male triumphalism. Bear in mind that those who have no past have no future. But however that may be, we are not here to tell women (correctly or incorrectly spelled) anything of a political nature. Our only mission is to spread the love of Dea Who was, is and ever will be the sole Creatrix, Mother, and Redemptrix of each and every one of us.